Why Founders Should Never Rely on Verbal Promises of Equity: Lessons from the Radish Media Litigation
- Jan 24
- 2 min read
Updated: Mar 16
Startups are often built on speed, trust, and momentum. Founders and early employees dive in together, fueled by a shared vision and—frequently—handshake deals about equity. But as the Lim v. Radish Media saga shows, relying on verbal promises of ownership can become a multi‑year legal nightmare with zero payoff.
In two rounds of litigation—Lim v. Radish Media (2024) and Lim v. Radish Media (2025)—the courts repeatedly rejected an early employee’s attempt to claim equity that he believed he had been promised.
1. A “Handshake Deal” Isn’t a Deal—Especially for Equity
In both complaints, Lim argued that Radish’s CEO had promised him equity—first 1.2%, later 1.5%—in exchange for lower cash compensation. The alleged promises were verbally discussed between friends, followed by email exchanges acknowledging “basic terms,” and reinforced through repeated assurances that “paperwork would come later.”
But none of that mattered. The courts found the supposed agreement unenforceable because equity grants take longer than one year to vest, which triggers the Statute of Frauds. That law requires that long‑term commitments—especially those involving ownership—must be in a signed writing to be enforceable.
Even though Lim provided messages from the CEO agreeing in principle, the court held that the emails did not include all essential terms, the draft offer letter was never signed, and the equity grant was conditioned on events that never happened (like board approval and a formal equity plan).
2. Promissory estoppel won’t rescue a vague equity promise
Lim tried a fallback argument: even if no contract existed, he relied on the CEO’s promises to his detriment and should be compensated. But promissory estoppel only works when the promise is clear, unconditional, and reasonable to rely on.
Here, none of those elements were satisfied. The alleged promises depended on future events Lim knew had not yet been completed. His reliance—continuing to work, declining other offers, accepting more responsibility—was not enough to overcome those uncertainties.
What Founders Should Learn From This Case
1. Put every equity promise in writing—immediately.
Do not hire, retain, or negotiate equity with anyone based on verbal or informal promises. If you wouldn’t invest based on a handshake, don’t hand out equity that way.
2. Use signed offer letters and stock agreements from day one.
Equity requires: a written offer, board approval, a stock option or equity plan, and a signed equity agreement.
3. Do not rely on friendship as a substitute for governance.
Lim and the CEO were close friends for more than a decade. That didn’t matter.
4. If equity paperwork is delayed, the employee is not “earning equity”—they are earning risk.
Delay benefits the company, not the employee.
Conclusion: Protect Your Startup (and Yourself) With Real Agreements
The Radish Media case is a stark reminder that startups don’t run on trust—they run on documentation. Verbal promises feel fast and founder‑friendly, but when a business succeeds, those early “friendly” deals become multi-million-dollar disputes.